Review article | Open Access
Curricular Studies & Perspectives 2026, Vol. 2(2) 176-197
pp. 176 - 197 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/csp.2026.1481.6
Publish Date: October 30, 2026 | Single/Total View: 0/0 | Single/Total Download: 0/0
Abstract
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, has produced a fragmented literature on how teachers use these technologies in professional practice. This qualitative metasynthesis examined how in-service teachers in Türkiye experience and negotiate AI-supported pedagogical work. National database and repository searches were supplemented by international and targeted retrieval, yielding 43 studies involving 904 in-service teachers. Thematic synthesis generated six descriptive themes and four higher-order analytical themes. Teachers reported that AI supported planning, materials development, differentiation, assessment, access to information, and professional learning, although these benefits remained dependent on professional judgement. Perceived efficiency gains were accompanied by new demands for verification, adaptation, and learning, as well as concerns about accuracy, cognitive dependence, academic integrity, privacy, equity, and human relationships. Teacher agency was reconfigured through selective pedagogical mediation involving selection, verification, adaptation, and boundary-setting. Responsible integration also depended on ecosystem capacity, including professional learning, infrastructure, governance, ethical safeguards, and equitable access. The synthesis conceptualizes the teacher–AI relationship as a conditional pedagogical partnership in which AI broadens pedagogical possibilities while educational legitimacy remains dependent on human judgement and supportive institutional conditions.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Generative AI, Teacher agency, Curriculum enactment
APA 7th edition
Baysal, H., & Baysal, O. (2026). Teacher Agency in AI-Supported Curriculum Enactment in Türkiye: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Curricular Studies & Perspectives, 2(2), 176-197. https://doi.org/10.29329/csp.2026.1481.6
Harvard
Baysal, H. and Baysal, O. (2026). Teacher Agency in AI-Supported Curriculum Enactment in Türkiye: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Curricular Studies & Perspectives, 2(2), pp. 176-197.
Chicago 16th edition
Baysal, Hulya and Okan Baysal (2026). "Teacher Agency in AI-Supported Curriculum Enactment in Türkiye: A Qualitative Metasynthesis". Curricular Studies & Perspectives 2 (2):176-197. https://doi.org/10.29329/csp.2026.1481.6
Adıgüzel, S., Karalı, Y., & Aydemir, H. (2025). Teachers’ views on the use of artificial intelligence in the education process. e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1511789
Akçin, A., Kurukafa, K., & Tarhan, A. (2026). Teachers’ perceptions of generative AI in education: Opportunities, challenges, and classroom use. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 25(2), 148–157.
Altın, M., Zengin, M., & Kaplan, S. (2026). Yapay zekânın program geliştirme ögeleri bağlamında kullanımı: İlkokul ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinin görüşleri. ATLAS Journal: International Refereed Journal on Social Sciences, 12(60), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21984148
Araycı, M. K., & Özyurt, M. (2026). Teachers’ technopedagogical competence and perspectives on artificial intelligence use in education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 9(3), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1926384
Arı, S. (2026). Primary school teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence and their opinions on artificial intelligence applications in life science courses. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 11(4), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1802147
Bearman, M., Tai, J., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Ajjawi, R. (2024). Developing evaluative judgement for a time of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2335321
Cebeci, S. (2025). Otonom öğrenme modelinin yapay zekâ araçları ile desteklendiği öğretmen eğitiminin BİLSEM öğretmenlerinin özerk öğrenmeyi destekleme davranışlarına ve yapay zekâ farkındalıklarına etkisi (Publication No. 968031) [Master’s thesis, Bahçeşehir University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
Cengiz, E., & Gümüş, M. (2025). What do teachers think about the use of artificial intelligence in educational environments? Sakarya University Journal of Education, 15(3), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1473933
Ciğerci, F. M., & Uygun, N. (2026). Evaluation of primary school teachers’ use and perceptions of artificial intelligence in primary school mathematics instruction: A mixed-methods study. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1741116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1741116
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2024). CASP checklist: For qualitative research. https://casp-uk.net/casp-checklists/CASP-checklist-qualitative-2024.pdf
Çelik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, Article 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Çelik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
Çelik, T. (2026). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde yapay zekâ araçları kullanım durumunun incelenmesi. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 332–360. https://doi.org/10.52826/mcbuefd.1777334
Dağıstan, A., & Taşdemir, M. (2026). Teachers’ opinions on artificial intelligence tools used in education (The case of Kırşehir). Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 22(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1733017
Demir, R., & Demir, M. (2026). Teknoloji odaklı STEM öğrenme senaryoları hazırlamada yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (49), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.14582/zgefd.1749960
Derinalp, P. (2026). In-service English teachers’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence in education. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.1856805
Eedelouei, S. (2026). Factors influencing language teachers’ judgements and decision-making about the use of generative AI tools: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 171, Article 105333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105333
Er, N., & Aksoy, N. (2026). Experiences of science teachers regarding the effects of generative artificial intelligence use on education and teaching processes. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice, 4(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.59455/qietp.59
Eren, E., Ayata, N., Çetinkaya, N. B., Yardımcı, T., Koç, A., & Akpınar, E. N. (2025). Eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımı: Öğretmenlerin perspektifinden bir değerlendirme. Toplum, Eğitim ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15460358
Erol, M., & Erol, A. (2024). Use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in education according to primary school teachers: Opportunities and challenges. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 14(3), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1446227
Fidan, M. (2025). Yapay zekânın temel eğitimde öğretim ve öğrenme üzerindeki etkisinin araştırılması: Eğitim uygulamalarına yönelik öğretmen ve veli görüşleri. International Primary Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.38089/iperj.2025.220
Filiz, O., Kaya, M. H., & Adiguzel, T. (2025). Teachers and AI: Understanding the factors influencing AI integration in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 17931–17967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13463-2
Güneş, A. (2025). DKAB öğretmenlerinin eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri. Kocatepe İslami İlimler Dergisi, 8(2), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.52637/kiid.1731555
Kalaba Yıldırım, Ö., & Önder, A. (2025). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımı hakkındaki görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu İnsan ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(5), 133–166. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15488892
Kara, D. N., & Aksu, S. (2026). Teachers’ perspectives on integrating new technologies in education: Embracing artificial intelligence. European Journal of Education, 61(3), Article e70734. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70734
Karabacak, S. (2024). Matematik eğitiminde ChatGPT yapay zekâ uygulamasının kullanımına yönelik ortaokul öğrenci ve öğretmenlerin görüşlerinin incelenmesi (Publication No. 899716) [Master’s thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kızıler, M. (2026). Yapay zekâ destekli öğrenme ortamlarında sınıf yönetimi: Öğretmen deneyimleri (Publication No. 914319) [Master’s thesis, Mardin Artuklu University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
Kic-Drgas, J., & Kılıçkaya, F. (2026). Artificial intelligence tool adoption for teachers’ self-regulated learning: A qualitative study of in-service language teachers. SAGE Open, 16(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261447078
Kölemen, E. B., Sarıoğlu, S., & Yıldırım, B. (2026). A new paradigm for preschool teachers: Integrating STEM and AI in flipped learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 54, 4907–4924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-026-02174-z
Kurtdede Fidan, N., & Kayar, İ. (2025). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin yapay zekâya bakışı: Uygulamaları, gelecek planları ve endişeleri. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(1), 1745–1773. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1583635
Kutlucan, E., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2026). Eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımı: Yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin sınav değerlendirmesine yönelik yaklaşımları. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 14, Article e2614002. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1698837
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO.
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Ministry of National Education. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education policy document and action plan (2025–2029). Directorate General for Innovation and Educational Technologies.
Ministry of National Education. (2026, January 10). Eğitimde yapay zekâ uygulamaları etik kılavuzu yayımlandı [Ethics guide for AI applications in education published]. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/quotegitimde-yapay-zeka-uygulamalari-etik-kilavuzuquot-yayimlandi/icerik/854
OECD. (2025). Results from TALIS 2024: The state of teaching. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/results-from-talis-2024_90df6235-en.html
Önal, N., İlhan, A. G., & Önal, N. T. (2026). How ready are gifted education teachers for AI integration? Evidence from BİLSEM in Türkiye. Education and Information Technologies, 31(10), 3007–3033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-13932-2
Özdemir, İ. L. (2025). Yabancı dil öğreniminde yapay zekâ kullanımı: Akademisyen, öğretmen ve öğretmen adayı görüşleri (Publication No. 990142) [Master’s thesis, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
Özkan, M., & Küpeli, A. E. (2025). Görsel sanatlar öğretmenlerinin görsel sanatlar eğitiminde yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik görüşleri. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 15(4), 2039–2055. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1748889
Özsongür, M. Z., & Çeliktürk Sezgin, Z. (2026). Primary school teachers’ experiences with generative artificial intelligence in education: Opportunities and limitations. Educational Academic Research, 61, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1714789
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Parlakkaya, Z. (2025). Okul öncesi eğitimde ChatGPT kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüş ve deneyimleri (Publication No. 952910) [Master’s thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
Pınar, M. A. (2026). Investigation of science teachers’ views on artificial intelligence. Educational Academic Research, 60, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1701184
Polat, Ş., & Özkan, H. (2026). Öğretmenlerinin eğitimde yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik algı, deneyim ve beklentileri: Fenomenolojik bir analiz. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(17), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.56677/mkuefder.1859535
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
Sontay, G., Kazancı, Y., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2024). Öğretimde yapay zekâ uygulamaları hakkında sınıf öğretmenleri ne düşünüyor? İstanbul Eğitim Dergisi, 1(1), 98–120. https://doi.org/10.71270/istanbulegitim.istj.1586392
Şahin, Ö. (2025). Yapay zeka araçlarının derslere entegrasyonunun değerlendirilmesi: SAMR modeli perspektifinden öğretmen yaklaşımlarının analizi (Publication No. 961519) [Master’s thesis, Sakarya University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Centre.
Taktak, M. (2024). Transformation of the teaching profession in Turkey with ChatGPT: Opportunities and challenges. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(3), 1595–1613. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.1413502
TEDMEM. (2025). TALIS 2024 Türkiye için neler söylüyor? [What does TALIS 2024 say for Türkiye?]. Türk Eğitim Derneği. https://tedmem.org/storage/writes/November2025/5xHbJHslxlaPnc1rLsTf.pdf
Tekin, H., & Ciğerci, F. M. (2025). Yapay zekâ destekli eğitim araçlarının ilkokul matematik öğretiminde kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Harran Maarif Dergisi, 10(2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.22596/hej.1780337
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, Article 181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
Tümen Akyıldız, S. (2026). Professional identity in AI-supported EFL teaching: A comparative qualitative study of pre-service and in-service teachers. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1783566. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1783566
Uğraş, M. (2024). Evaluation of ChatGPT usage in preschool education: Teacher perspectives. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori ve Uygulama, 15(30), 387–414. https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1537337
Uğraş, M., Çakır, Z., Zacharis, G., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2025). ChatGPT in early childhood science education: Can it offer innovative effective solutions to overcome challenges? Computers, 14(9), Article 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14090368
Uğur Erdoğmuş, F. (2026). Integration of AI into education: Teachers’ perspectives on competencies, challenges, and needs. Participatory Educational Research, 13(5), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.67.13.5
Üretmen Karaoğlu, S., & Doğan, C. (2025). EFL teachers’ insights on incorporating AI in language education. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 18(3), 630–657. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1658985
Velander, J., Taiye, M. A., Otero, N., & Milrad, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in K-12 education: Eliciting and reflecting on Swedish teachers’ understanding of AI and its implications for teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 4085–4105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11990-4
Viberg, O., Cukurova, M., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Alexandron, G., Shirai, S., Kanemune, S., Wasson, B., Tømte, C., Spikol, D., Milrad, M., Coelho, R., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2025). What explains teachers’ trust in AI in education across six countries? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 1288–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00433-x
Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2026). Pedagogical partnerships with generative AI in higher education: How dual cognitive pathways paradoxically enable transformative learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 23, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00585-x
Yaylak, E. (2025). Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerinin yapay zekâ araçlarını eğitim süreçlerinde kullanımına yönelik görüşleri. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, (YZ (AI) ve Gelecek Perspektifler özel sayısı), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1753115