Research article | Open Access
Curricular Studies & Perspectives 2026, Vol. 2(2) 159-175
Analytical Thinking Opportunities and Students’ Experiences through Active Learning: A Qualitative Case Study in a Middle School EFL Classroom
pp. 159 - 175
Publish Date: October 30, 2026 | Single/Total View: 0/0 | Single/Total Download: 0/0
Abstract
This qualitative single-case study examined, based on students’ accounts, how active learning activities integrated into the eighth-grade English as a Foreign Language (EFL) curriculum provided opportunities for analytical thinking and how students experienced these activities. The study was conducted in a public middle school in Türkiye over a six-week period. Curriculum-aligned activities included simulated telephone conversations, dialogue construction, prediction tasks, and collaborative discussions, guided by four active learning dimensions: collaborative learning, active engagement, reflective discussion, and student-centered expression. Data were collected through reflective journals from 25 students and semi-structured interviews with 12 volunteers. Thematic analysis combined a deductive approach to analytical thinking processes with an inductive approach to students’ experiences. Findings indicated opportunities for strategic thinking and problem-solving through adapting explanations, inference-making through contextual and visual clues, and comparison through evaluating alternative expressions and dialogues. Students reported benefits from contextual support, peer interaction, and simulated activities, alongside difficulties interpreting unfamiliar language, uncertainty about their responses, limited individual thinking time, and constraints on self-expression. By examining analytical thinking opportunities alongside students’ cognitive and affective experiences, the study illustrates how existing EFL curriculum activities can provide opportunities for analytical engagement while highlighting the importance of instructional support and conditions for participation. This offers a context-sensitive understanding of both the opportunities and limitations of integrating analytical thinking opportunities into regular EFL curriculum.
Keywords: analytical thinking, active learning, qualitative case study, higher order thinking, EFL teaching
APA 7th edition
Ilhan, E., & Oz, E. (2026). Analytical Thinking Opportunities and Students’ Experiences through Active Learning: A Qualitative Case Study in a Middle School EFL Classroom. Curricular Studies & Perspectives, 2(2), 159-175.
Harvard
Ilhan, E. and Oz, E. (2026). Analytical Thinking Opportunities and Students’ Experiences through Active Learning: A Qualitative Case Study in a Middle School EFL Classroom. Curricular Studies & Perspectives, 2(2), pp. 159-175.
Chicago 16th edition
Ilhan, Elif and Eda Oz (2026). "Analytical Thinking Opportunities and Students’ Experiences through Active Learning: A Qualitative Case Study in a Middle School EFL Classroom". Curricular Studies & Perspectives 2 (2):159-175.
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
Amer, A. (2005). Analytical thinking. Cairo University, Center for Advancement of Postgraduate Studies and Research in Engineering Sciences.
Amrullah, A., Sahuddin, S., Fajri, M., & Apgriyanto, K. (2020). Learning to speak English through task-based approach. In 1st Annual Conference on Education and Social Sciences (ACCESS 2019) (pp. 1–4). Atlantis Press.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). Addison Wesley Longman.
Auerbach, A. J., & Schussler, E. (2017). A vision and change reform of introductory biology shifts faculty perceptions and use of active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), ar57.
Beimel, D., Tsoury, A., & Barnett-Itzhaki, Z. (2024). The impact of extent and variety in active learning methods across online and face-to-face education on students’ course evaluations. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1432054.
Bhijakkanarin, J., & Kenaphoom, S. (2024). Enhancing analytical thinking skills in elementary students: A documentary research on pedagogical methods and outcomes. Procedia of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(8), 27.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills. Palgrave.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Di Battista, A., Grayling, S., Hasselaar, E., Leopold, T., Li, R., Rayner, M., & Zahidi, S. (2023). Future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2007). Analytic thinking: How to take thinking apart and what to look for when you do. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Erdoğan, İ. (2024). Eğitim yönetiminde analitik düşünme öğretim yöntemi stratejilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Davranış Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(22), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.10.22.14
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Froyd, J. E. (2008). Evidence for the efficacy of student-active learning pedagogies. Project Kaleidoscope, 66, 64–74. https://petersj.people.charleston.edu/CCLI/PDF/Efficacy_of_Student-active_Learning_Pedagogies.pdf
Guo, R., Jantharajit, N., & Thongpanit, P. (2024). Enhancing analytical and critical thinking skills through reflective and collaborative learning: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 11(2), 200–223. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v11i2.1166
Güçlü, Y. (2024). Mantıksal çözümlemeli düşünme yöntemlerinde otantik materyaller ile gerçek dünya durumlarının kullanımı. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(34), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.8.34.28
Güneş, F. (2012). Öğrencilerin düşünme becerilerini geliştirme [Developing students’ thinking skills]. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları(32), 127–146.
Hollett, E., & Cassalia, A. (2023). Analytical thinking for advanced learners, grades 3–5. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003268338
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365–379.
Kanyılmaz, B. M., & Özata Yücel, B. (2020). The evaluation of teachers’ in-class practices and opinions for developing analytical thinking skill of primary school students in the course of science. Education and Science, 45(204), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8876
Khaitov, B. S. (2024). Effective development of students’ analytical and critical thinking skills. Current Research Journal of Pedagogics, 5(8), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.37547/pedagogics-crjp-05-08-07
Konopka, C. L., Adaime, M. B., & Mosele, P. H. (2015). Active teaching and learning methodologies: Some considerations. Creative Education, 6(14), 1536–1545.
Kuru, G., & Şimşek, A. (2022). Investigation of studies on critical thinking skills for primary school in Turkey. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(3), 1062–1089. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2022..-1102533
Li, L. (2022). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers, 26, 1697–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y
Lund, T. J., & Stains, M. (2015). The importance of context: An exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(13), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8
Manalo, E., & Sheppard, C. (2016). How might language affect critical thinking performance? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.005
Marzano, R. J. (1993). How classroom teachers approach the teaching of thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 154–160.
Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (Eds.). (2006). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.
Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
Ministry of National Education. (2019). PISA 2018 Türkiye ön raporu [PISA 2018 Türkiye preliminary report]. MEB. https://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/03105347_PISA_2018_Turkiye_On_Raporu.pdf
OECD. (2016). Skills matter: Further results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Skills Studies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258051-en
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. W. W. Norton & Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
Rose, D. H., & Dalton, B. (2009). Learning to read in the digital age. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01057.x
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001
Saunders, L., & Wong, M. A. (2020). Active learning: Engaging people in the learning process. Instruction in libraries and information centers. Windsor & Downs Press, Illinois Open Publishing Network.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The rainbow project: Enhancing the SAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative skills. Intelligence, 34, 321–350.
Suyatman, S., Saputro, S., Sunarno, W., & Sukarmin, S. (2021). Profile of student analytical thinking skills in the natural sciences by implementing problem-based learning model. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, (23), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2021-023-suya
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Wang, S., & Seepho, S. (2017). Facilitating Chinese EFL learners’ critical thinking skills: The contributions of teaching strategies. SAGE Open, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017734024
Yu, S., Jantharajit, N., & Srikhao, S. (2024). Collaborative inquiry-based instructional model to enhance mathematical analytical thinking and reasoning skills for fourth-grade students. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 10(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v10i1.5323
